C9300-24T introduced July 2017
C9300-48T introduced July 2017
C9300-24UX introduced Nov 2017
These switches are the successor to the Catalyst 3850. C3850s use the UADP 1.0 and (later) 1.1 ASICs. The C9300s use the UADP 2.0 custom Cisco silicon. The entire family is stackable switches. The bus that interconnects stack members runs at 480 Gb/s. But individual stack members probably contain multiple ASICs or multi-core ASICs that also use the stack system internally for core-to-core interconnect. The stacking architecture permits packets to be recirculated through the switch processing engine to implement things like VxLAN routing. In product videos cisco hypes recirulation as a major enhancement that teaches old ASICs new tricks. Other vendors have pipeline architectures with multiple stages to achieve the same end. That may be a better idea. Words about the UADP 1.0 are relevant to these products as well.
What Cisco has to say about packet buffers is:
This was extracted from table 4 of the 24-page data sheet. The information is less than satisfying. Perhaps Cisco will publish a real architecture paper. If the multigig UX model uses the same UADP ASIC as the gig-E models, then the per-core buffer would be the same. So, it's a mystery. It does seem that the UADP 2.0 core engine has more packet memory than the 6 MB of the 1.1 predecessor. Buffer per SKU is not what we want to know. We want buffer per core.
The C9300 switches can use uplink modules from its C3850 predecessor. In addition, it has it's own models which are not backward compatible to the C3850.
C9500-24Q introduced July 2017
C9500-40X introduced September 2017
The C9500-24Q and C9500-40X use the UADP2.0 XL ASIC. The C9300s use the UADP 2.0 ASIC. The differences are shown in the table. Both 2.0 ASICs have 28 nm features.
Last update March 2021.