%PDF-1.5 % 1 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (section.1) >> endobj 4 0 obj (Introduction) endobj 5 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (section.2) >> endobj 8 0 obj (Tenure Insecurity in Theory and in Zambia) endobj 9 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.2.1) >> endobj 12 0 obj (The Tenure Hypothesis) endobj 13 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.2.2) >> endobj 16 0 obj (Land Rights in Zambia) endobj 17 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.2.3) >> endobj 20 0 obj (Perceptions of Insecurity at Baseline) endobj 21 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (section.3) >> endobj 24 0 obj (Study Design) endobj 25 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.3.1) >> endobj 28 0 obj (Intervention) endobj 29 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.3.2) >> endobj 32 0 obj (Data and Baseline Balance) endobj 33 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.3.3) >> endobj 36 0 obj (Estimation) endobj 37 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (section.4) >> endobj 40 0 obj (Impact of the Intervention) endobj 41 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.4.1) >> endobj 44 0 obj (First Stage: The Intervention Strengthened Land Rights) endobj 45 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.4.2) >> endobj 48 0 obj (Second Stage: The Tenure Intervention Had No Effect on Pre-Registered Measures of Investment) endobj 49 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.4.3) >> endobj 52 0 obj (There Is No Evidence of Larger Effects on Fearful Households) endobj 53 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.4.4) >> endobj 56 0 obj (There Is No Impact on Other Measures of Investment or Labor Allocations) endobj 57 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (section.5) >> endobj 60 0 obj (Why Do Our Results Differ from Those of the Prior Literature?) endobj 61 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.5.1) >> endobj 64 0 obj (Differences in Identification Assumptions) endobj 65 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.5.2) >> endobj 68 0 obj (Differences in Context: Is Zambia Comparable to the Setting of Prior Studies?) endobj 69 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.5.3) >> endobj 72 0 obj (Applying the Research Designs of Observational Studies Yields Estimates Similar to the Prior Literature) endobj 73 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.5.4) >> endobj 76 0 obj (Other Recent Experimental Work) endobj 77 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (section.6) >> endobj 80 0 obj (Discussion and Conclusion) endobj 81 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.6.1) >> endobj 84 0 obj (Why Does Tenure Security Have No Impact?) endobj 85 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.6.2) >> endobj 88 0 obj (Directions for Future Work) endobj 89 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (appendix.A) >> endobj 92 0 obj (Empirical Appendix \(For Online Publication\)) endobj 93 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.A.1) >> endobj 96 0 obj (Robustness: Perceptions of Tenure Security) endobj 97 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.A.2) >> endobj 100 0 obj (Robustness: Other Measures of Investment) endobj 101 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.A.3) >> endobj 104 0 obj (Main Results with Confidence Intervals) endobj 105 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsection.A.4) >> endobj 108 0 obj (More Heterogeneity) endobj 109 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsubsection.A.4.1) >> endobj 112 0 obj (Impacts on Perceptions of Tenure Security) endobj 113 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (subsubsection.A.4.2) >> endobj 116 0 obj (Impacts on Investment) endobj 117 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (appendix.B) >> endobj 120 0 obj (Theoretical Appendix \(For Online Publication\)) endobj 121 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D [122 0 R /Fit] >> endobj 126 0 obj << /Length 1973 /Filter /FlateDecode >> stream xڝX[o~# Dk.LZiNpNj-<ȵĆ"Y~3)GAٹ|sY\Uڣ;l~^,Ro4TN,U>z;(J]h!B/ytl]vGoh'Ur}Rߎvq2/ JǦ]%`ybsȇFW"*/L}79.mkObVߘNL9"*NoR!vqD즦N}G+UE3rU#/UQ1a,7z7^[TBXd76,=i]O=LPy,yfyv+pbū8ՏZ{ruAivx*]@V($r{or06}=C!dv0B$QQ9E"$n`̀ߙJ]Y[pwMoFԼjLc)n˻(C =-[fAА+SqXq: vj7KF|`kq&Y Vitf10Eدe+'g&jgq| BH9RdX"iln[فhGf?`h`H7L3auAb`Ϲ3|K-Xx@Bwr?1,4Z3bg6D9S