next up previous
Next: Suggested Topics Up: HUMA 11500, Autumn 2004, Previous: HUMA 11500, Autumn 2004,

Instructions

The paper (3-5 pages long) is due Wed., Dec. 8, in my office, Gates-Blake 228, by 4:30pm. Gates-Blake is the building connected to Cobb. (I am setting the 4:30pm limit mostly because Gates-Blake gets locked at some point in the evening--I'm not sure exactly when.)


As in the case of the other papers: the below topics are suggestions. If you want to write on another topic, feel free to do so. It might be a good idea, however, in that case, to check with me and/or Justin first.


The intent of the paper is to discuss the views or attitudes of our authors and/or their characters, rather than your own opinions on a certain topic. Of course you can't and shouldn't completely keep your own opinions out of it, but your argument as a whole should aim at establishing something about or authors and/or their characters mean. Your thesis should be your own, original idea about that.


(In particular, this means your argument should not mainly aim at showing that our authors and/or their characters are good or bad or right or wrong. Before you could ever decide that you would have to figure out what they actually think and how they actually act, which is what this paper should be about.)


There are two difficult but important distinctions which can potentially be drawn between Socrates and Plato: (1) between Plato's Socrates and Socrates as he really was; (2) between Plato's character Socrates and Plato himself. I use the phrase Plato and/or Socrates below to indicate that you might want to make either or both of these distinctions. (For the purposes of distinction (1), data from Aristophanes and Xenophon could obviously be important, and possibly some of the stories about Plato and Diogenes the Cynic; there are other ways of guessing, too.) (Note also that Plato might not always portray Socrates in the same way--Socrates in the Apology, the Euthyphro, the Meno, and the Republic, might all be different.)


All of the below topics require you to use material from both Plato and Aristotle. As I just mentioned, Aristophanes, Xenophon, and the stories about Diogenes could be useful as well. In addition, all of the topics allow (though none require) the use of Homer. But even if you do use some of that material, please make sure that both the Meno and Aristotle play an important role in your paper.


Refer to Plato by Stephanus numbers and Aristotle by Becker numbers. As before, use book and line number for Homer and line numbers for Aristophanes. You can use page numbers in Xenophon and Diogenes Laertieus. In all these cases, you need give information about the translation you used only if it's different from the one I ordered/handed out. Once again, you need give full bibliographical references only if you for some reason bring in an outside source.


next up previous
Next: Suggested Topics Up: HUMA 11500, Autumn 2004, Previous: HUMA 11500, Autumn 2004,
Abe Stone 2005-09-28