edslug

203t


Course Description


This course is designed to assist elementary teacher candidates in their development of instructional approaches, methods, and strategies for English Language Learners (ELL) with a focus on the social studies.  The subject matter of the course includes an examination of English Language Development (ELD) state framework and standards, teaching methods, curriculum, and assessments. We will also introduce and explore the CA Social Studies Framework and Standards and methods of instruction for the social studies with attention to Specially-Designed Academic-Instruction in English (SDAIE). Participants will be invited to complete assignments that address social, conceptual, and academic tasks while fostering students' communicative competence in English while encouraging native language development.  Further, the course will address ways to support students' expression of meaning in a variety of ways, including the use of objects and visual representations. Course participants will learn to teach elementary students how social science concepts and themes provide insights into historical periods and cultures (e.g., teaching using timelines, maps, and other graphic organizers to develop conceptual understanding of historical periods, events, and cultures). We will be specifically interested in making challenging content understood by all learners, regardless of their English proficiency. .

Kip Téllez, Ph.D.
Education Department
McHenry 1286
University of California, Santa Cruz
1156 High Street  Santa Cruz, CA  95064
(831) 459-2208
ktellez@ucsc.edu
http://people.ucsc.edu/~ktellez


Required Texts (available at the Bay Tree Bookstore)

Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, NH : Heinemann. ISBN: 0325003661

Recommended

Bigelow, B. (2008). A people's history for the classroom. Rethinking Schools.

Echevarria, J., et al. (2008). Making content comprehensible for English Learners: The SIOP model (3rd Edition). Boston: Pearson

Téllez, K. (2010). Teaching English learners: Fostering language and the democratic experience. Boulder, CO: Paradigm

Zarillo, J. (2009). Teaching elementary social studies. Boston: Pearson.


Required readings

Bailey, A. (2008) Teaching and assessing students learning English in school. pdf

Bigelow, B. (2008). Readings from People's history. pdf

Combined EL and ELD Content Standards pdf

California History/Social Science Content Standards.  pdf

Crawford, J. (2004). Basic research on second language language acquisiton. Educating English Learners. pdf

EdSource. (2008). English learners in CA: What the numbers say. pdf

Genesee, F.  (1999). Program alternatives for linguistically diverse students.  Santa Cruz, CA: CREDE. pdf

Gutierrez, K. (1995). Unpacking academic discourse. Discourse Processes, 19, 21-37. pdf

Kinsella, K. (2005). Teaching vocabulary. pdf

Jiménez, R. (2004). More equitable literacy assessments for Latino students. The Reading Teacher, 57, 576-578. pdf

Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N. (2002).  How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ch 1 and 2 only. pdf

McLaughlin, B. (1992). Myths and misconceptions about L2 learning. NCREDSLL html

Pang, E.S., & Kamil, M.L. (2004). Second language issues and early literacy instruction. Temple University: LSS Publication Series, No. 1 pdf

Scarcella, R. (n.d.) English learners and writers: Responding to linguistic diversity. pdf

Short, D., & Echevarria, J. (n.d.). Teacher skills to support English language learners. pdf

Solomon, J., & Rhodes, N. (1995). Conceptualizing academic language. CAL. html

Snow, M., & Katz, A. (2010). English language development: Foundations and implementation in K through 5. In Improving education for English learners: Research-based approaches (pp. 83-150). Sacramento, CA: CDE. pdf

Spanos, G., Rhodes, N., Dale, T.C. & Crandall J. (1988). Linguistic features of mathematical problem solving. In R. Cocking & J.P. Mestre (Eds.), Linguistic and cultural influences on learning mathematics (pp. 221-240). Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum. pdf

Valdes, G. (2000). Bilingualism and language use among Mexican-Americans. In S.L. McKay & S.L. Wong, New immigrants in the US. NY: Cambridge U Press. pdf

Wong-Fillmore, L., & Snow, C. (2000). What teachers need to know about language. CAL html

Zarillo, J. (2008). The transformation curriculum: Infusing multicultural perspectives. Chapter 3. Boston, MA: Pearson. pdf


Recommended readings

Blau, E.K. (1991). The effect of syntax, speed, and pauses on listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 24 (4), 746-753. pdf

Butler, F.A., Bailey, A., Stevens, R., Lord, C. & Huang, B. (2004). Academic English in Fifth-grade Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies Textbooks, CSE Report 642 Los Angeles: CRESST/University of California, LA. pdf

Cox, B.E., Shanahan, T., & Sulzby, E. (1990). Good and poor elementary readers' use of cohesion. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(1), 47-65 .pdf

EdSource. (2007). Similar English learner students, different results: Why do some schools do better? pdf

Enright, D.S., & McCloskey, M.L.  (1988).  Integrating English, Part II: Integrated Units.  Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. pdf

Ervin-Tripp, S.M. (1974). Is second language learning like the first? TESOL Quarterly, 8, 111-127. pdf

Erneling, C. (1993). Understanding language acquisition: the framework of learning (Ch 1). Albany: SUNY Press. pdf

Griffin, C., Malone, L., & Kameenui, E. (1995). Effects of graphic organizer instruction on fifth-grade students. The Journal of Educational Research, 98-107. pdf

Laturnau, J.  (2002).  Standards-based instruction for English Language Learners.  Honolulu, HI: PREL    html

Lightbown, P.M. (2000). Anniversary article: Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21, 431-462. pdf

Polio, C. (1997). Measures of writing accuracy... . Language Learning, 47, 101-143. pdf

Richards, J.C., & Rodgers, T.S.  (1986).  Total physical response.  From Approaches and methods in language teaching (pp. 87-98).  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pdf

Scarcella, R. (2003). Academic English: A conceptual framework. LMRI. pdf

Van Patten, B. (2003). Some givens about second language aquisition. From input to output. Boston: McGraw-Hill. pdf

Wallerstein, N.  (1986).  The teaching approach of Paulo Freire.  In J. Oller, (Ed.), Methods that work.  Boston: Heinle & Heinle. pdf


Other Resources

ELL Writing Samples

List of Wordless Picture Books

Guitar Starter Documents

Easy Guitar Songs to Sing

Nifty Book Report Form

Almost Zero Planning Language Activities

CELDT Materials

SDAIE Review

Social Studies Assessment CAT

Course Slides


 

Course Schedule (Subject to Change)

Session/Date Topic

Readings
(please read prior to the class session)

Assignment(s) Due or Things to Bring

1

Jan. 10, 12

 

Course Overview & Introductions

Who are our EL
s?

Where are our ELs
?

What are the program options for our ELs?

Review EL terms

Video: "Seasons of Change"

Ed Source: ELs in CA

Valdés

Genesee


Group Reading Analysis (in class)

2

Jan. 17, 19

What do teachers need to know about language?

What are the elements of language and how do they relate to one another?

Why do we need to scaffold language in order to promote learning?

What's the relation between general theories of learning and (Second Language(L2) learning/acquisition?

Video: "The Human Language-First Language"

Wong-Fillmore & Snow

Gibbons Ch 1

Individual Reading Analysis due

3

Jan. 24, 26

What are common myths about L2 learning?

What are the theories of L2 learning and acquisition?

How do theories of L2 acquisition inform instruction?

Introduction to English language development levels.

Applying theory to classroom experience and instructional practice.

Video: Assesing language levels

McLaughlin

Lightbown & Spada

Crawford

 

Group Reading Analysis (in class)

Bring in CELDT scores/levels for ELs in your placement class

4

Jan. 31, Feb.3

What are the language goals and objectives for California ELs?

What
are effective practices for teaching ELs?

How do teachers use models of EL development and how do they relate to effective practices?

ELD/ELA Standards comparison/group discussion and Video: Sample ELD lesson

Combined EL and ELA Standards

Content Standards/ELD levels

Snow & Katz

Gibbons Ch 2

Individual Reading Analysis due (ELD/ELA Standards comparison)

5

Feb. 7, 9

What are the foundations of social studies education?

How can you transform social science instruction to include multiple perspectives and the contributions of underrepresented groups?

Content Area Task: Social Science Planning

Discuss CAT Prompts in small groups.

Guest Speaker: Esther! will speak on including diverse perspectives in teaching.

CA History/Social Science Standards

Bigelow

Individual Reading Analysis due

Please bring copy of your classroom's social studies textbook and teacher's guide

6

Feb. 14, 16

What are effective practices for productive language (speaking and writing) development?

What strategies help ELs go from speaking to academic writing in social studies?

How can an analysis of language functions, frames, and fluency be used to promote effective practices?

Sample Social studies using innovative mapping.

Analysis of EL sample writing

Guest speaker: Felicia! Presenting on writers' workshop for ELs.

Gibbons Chs 3 and 4

Bailey

Zarillo

 

Group Reading Analysis (in class)

7

Feb. 21, 23

Understanding context specific language demands

What does an analysis of social science text books reveal about the language demands of the content?

What is a contrastive analysis of two langauges and how might teachers benefit from its use?

Can cognates help in promoting academic language?

Analyze social studies text for use of academic language; Practice strategies for scaffolding academic texts (e.g., chapter walk, think-aloud, SQ3R in social studies)

Guest lecture from Lorie!

Climbing the Redwoods

Rejuventation of Sempervirens...

Spanos et al.

Solomon & Rhodes

Gutierrez

Brief Contrastive Analysis

Individual Reading Analysis due

 

Assignment 2: CAT/Social Studies Lesson Design and Implementation

8

Feb. 28, Mar.1

What are effectives practices for receptive language (listening and reading) development?

Tech project Instructional technology and hypertext for L2 teaching: Creating a customized computer learning application in the social sciences.

Working with technology to teach language withimages, sounds, and video

Gibbons Chs 5 and 6

Pang & Kamil

Directions for PowerPoint Project

Group Reading Analysis (in class)

 

Assignment 1: ELD Group Lesson Presentation

9

Mar. 6, 7

How do we use valid language assessments?

CELDT/Redsignation/Other Issues/Video analysis

Sharing your quick EL assessment results in job-alike groups; Sample assessment activities.

Guest Speaker: Ellen Ferguson, Soledad USD

Assessment of English

Readings on CELDT

Jiménez

Individual Reading Analysis due (EL Assessment)

 

10

Mar. 13, 15

Using Existing Curriculum in ELD

What is the role of music in L2 development? What other language strategies might we use to enhance and supplement language acquisition?

Analyzing various ELD district adopted materials.

Video: Teaching in images and objects.

 

Gibbons Ch 7

Selections from various EL curricula

Group Reading Analysis (in class)

Bring sample ELD Teacher's Guide.

Assignment 3: Group/Individual ELD Instructional Technology Project due

Final Exam Week Wrapping up    

Course Assignments

1. ELD Group Lesson Presentation (completed in placement and videorecorded). Using an example taken from either the Gibbons text, 50 Strategies book, or another sources, your job-alike group will plan, teach, and videorecord a lesson to a group of ELL in one of your placement classrooms. Your group should meet with Kip prior to conducting your lesson. You will turn in your videorecorded lesson (edited to 10-15 minutes of highlights) along with a single, collaborative reflective essay (about 750 words) noting those aspects that your group thought were successful and those elements to alter for future lessons. Please write your group members' names on the face of the compact disc (cd) or dvd disc. We will watch your video in class to learn from each groups' experience.
Evaluation
(25 points possible): Quality of understanding of lesson design, connection to concepts and theories found in other course readings, comprehensiveness and coherence, connection to recognized objectives and standards, and quality of reflection.

2. Content Area Task (CAT)/Social Studies Lesson Design and Implementation (completed individually). Please develop and conduct an original Social Studies-based lesson in your placement classroom. Select an historical period or event revelant to the state standards. The overarching design should provide for multiple representations of language and content as well as a specialized language input to provide access to cognitively demanding content. Please use the SIOP lesson plan format shared in class. Be sure that your lesson includes graphic organizers (e.g., maps, timelines) to assist in conceptual development. Also please refer to CAT Elementary History-Social Science Planning Task commentary prompts.
Evaluation
(25 points possible): Content Area Task Planning Rubic EH2 only.


3 . Group or Individual Social Sciences/SDAIE Instructional Technology Project Using Microsoft PowerPoint
(or other hypertext/hyperlinked software). Please choose an objective relevant to your grade level(s) in social sciences and create a customized instructional technology project. The project should include user-selected navigation capabilities and the use of hyperlinked text and images to provide multiple representations of language/content. In addition, you or your group will invite at least 4 students (one ELL) to test your project. Please complete a 300-400 word write-up sharing the students' reactions to your project and your reflections on its success. Please submit your project on a cd. Please include the names of each group member on the face of cd. Place a copy of your write-up (as Word or text file) on the cd as well.
Evaluation
(25 points possible): Amount and quality of representational support, Comprehensiveness, Student engagement, Connection to relevant standards.


4. Group Reading Analysis or Individual Reading Analysis. Each week, you will be asked to analyze one of the required readings in the course using one of two strategies: A Group Reading Analysis invites your job-alike group to offer your collective reactions to one of the readings, completed during class time, while an Individual Reaction brief (about 350 words) will invite you to write your own reflection on a reading prior to the class session for which that reading is assigned. Directions for each type of assignment reading analysis will be given in class or via email.
Evaluation
(25 points possible-2.5 points each): Comprehension, Comprehensiveness. Sorry, no make-ups for these assignments.
Due Dates will Vary.

Grading scale: 94-100:A; 90-93:A-; 87-89:B+:83-86:B;80-82:B-. Satisfactory: Minimum 80 pts.

Miscellanea
Students with disabilities are encouraged to speak with the instructor as soon as possible regarding needed modifications to the course structure.  In addition, please contact the UCSC Disabilities Resources Center at 831-459-2089 for general assistance.
We hold to the ideals of academic integrity adopted by the UCSC community.
Finally, please, please let me know if the course is not meeting your needs in any way. Comments and suggestions are always welcome via email, phone message, or written note. Thanks, Kip